RTMP vs HLS for Optimal Video Streaming Experience

If you're choosing between HLS vs RTMP, especially for platforms like YouTube, OBS, or GDPR-compliant apps in Europe, knowing the trade-offs is crucial. This guide explains the real-world pros and cons, performance, and best use cases of each protocol, and why WebRTC might actually be your best option.

Whether you're passionate about immersive virtual meetings or crave flawless on-demand movies, we're here to elevate your viewing pleasure to new heights! Ready to say goodbye to buffering blues and stream like a pro? Let's dive in and unlock the world of uninterrupted entertainment!

Table of Contents

1. What is HLS?
2. Advantages of HLS
3. Disadvantages of HLS
4. What is RTMP?
5. Advantages of RTMP
6. Disadvantages of RTMP
7. Differences between HLS and RTMP
8. Best HLS and RTMP alternative
9. Advantages of WebRTC over HLS and RTMP
10. Disadvantages of WebRTC
11. Enhancing video conferencing with Digital Samba: Harnessing the power of WebRTC
12. Conclusion

What is HLS?

HLS (HTTP Live Streaming) is a protocol developed by Apple that breaks video into small segments and delivers them over HTTP. It's supported natively by nearly all modern devices and browsers, making it one of the most accessible streaming formats today.

HLS is particularly useful for reaching broad audiences on different devices. Because it relies on standard HTTP protocols, it can be distributed via CDNs and web servers, making it highly scalable. It supports adaptive bitrate streaming, which ensures viewers with slower connections still get a watchable stream.

Advantages of HLS

HLS technology has revolutionised the way we consume video content online. It offers a range of benefits that enhance the viewing experience for audiences worldwide. Here are some key advantages of using HLS for streaming media:

• Universal compatibility: Works on mobile, desktop, smart TVs, and more.
• Adaptive bitrate: Delivers the best possible quality based on network conditions.
• Subtitles and captions: Built-in support for accessibility.
• CDN-friendly: Easy to scale globally.
• Ad support: Integrates with VAST and VPAID.
• Built-in encryption: Supports HTTPS and DRM.
• Modular delivery: Efficient for buffering and playback continuity.

Incorporating HLS into your streaming solution can significantly improve the user experience, offering a seamless, high-quality, and secure way to deliver content to a global audience.

WebRTC VS HSL: Unravelling the Ultimate Showdown

Read the blog

WebRTC VS HSL: Unravelling the Ultimate Showdown

Disadvantages of HLS

While HLS reigns supreme in many streaming scenarios, it isn't perfect. Here are some potential drawbacks to consider:

• High latency: Typically 10–30 seconds behind real-time, which can be a blocker for live interactions.
• Bandwidth-heavy: Requires a stable internet connection.
• Not ideal for real-time use: Primarily suited for VOD or linear live streaming.
• Initial setup overhead: Setting up encoding pipelines and segmenting can require technical planning.

Remember, the ideal streaming solution depends on your specific needs and priorities. Weigh these potential downsides against HLS's strengths to make an informed decision.

What is RTMP?

RTMP (Real-Time Messaging Protocol) was originally developed by Macromedia for Flash-based streaming. While its browser playback days are over, it's still popular for live ingest in tools like OBS.

RTMP maintains a persistent TCP connection, enabling data to stream with minimal delay. Because of this, it's widely used to send live feeds to platforms that then transcode the video into a viewer-friendly format (like HLS).

Comparing WebRTC with Other Real-Time Communication Protocols

Read the blog

Comparing WebRTC with Other Real-Time Communication Protocols

Advantages of RTMP

Want your live streams to feel like you're broadcasting straight from the action ground? For getting your content to the server quickly, RTMP is a strong choice. Here's what makes RTMP valuable for this specific use case:

• Low latency: Delivers video with minimal delay, essential for real-time experiences.
• Efficient for ingestion: Favoured by platforms like YouTube and Twitch.
• Bandwidth light: Makes efficient use of available network capacity.
• Multi-stream capable: Transports audio, video, and metadata concurrently.
• OBS-ready: Natively supported by popular streaming software.

Disadvantages of RTMP

While RTMP has its strengths, it's necessary to be aware of the limitations in the modern streaming landscape:

• Not supported by modern browsers: Requires transcoding before playback.
• Security concerns: Needs RTMPS or external encryption for secure delivery.
• End-of-life for Flash: RTMP is no longer used for direct playback.
• Limited scope: It's only suitable for ingest, not delivery.

RTMP continues to hold significant value in the arsenal of live streaming tools, thanks to its impressive low latency and versatile nature. Recognising its primary role as an ingestion protocol rather than the comprehensive end-to-end solution it was previously perceived as is essential for harnessing its full potential in contemporary streaming configurations.

Differences between HLS and RTMP

When it comes to online video streaming, two protocols reign supreme: HLS and RTMP. But choosing between them can be confusing, especially for newbies. Understanding the key differences between HLS and RTMP is crucial for making an informed decision. Let's break it down using some vital parameters:

Delivery method:

• HLS: Think of it like a postman delivering pre-packaged parcels (video segments) over the internet. It uses the familiar HTTP protocol, making it readily accessible by most devices and browsers.
• RTMP: Imagine a dedicated courier service continuously streaming data in real-time. This protocol offers a persistent connection, ideal for low-latency applications.

Device compatibility:

• HLS: Because it uses the HTTP protocol, HLS is seen as the king of cross-platform compatibility! It works seamlessly on desktops, mobiles, tablets, and smart TVs, making it ideal for reaching a broad audience.
• RTMP: Basically used for stream ingestion nowadays. Many modern browsers do not support it.

Adaptability:

• HLS: Videos are delivered in segments. Hence, HLS is a master of adjusting here! It delivers multiple versions of your video at different bitrates, allowing viewers with varying internet speeds to enjoy a smooth experience. This is called adaptive bitrate streaming.
• RTMP: Less flexible. It delivers a single video stream, which might cause buffering issues for viewers with slower connections.

Latency:

• HLS: Takes a slight time before reaching viewers, resulting in slightly higher latency (delay). This is due to its segmented nature and reliance on HTTP requests.
• RTMP: Delivers video in real-time and offers lower latency. It is ideal for live streams where minimal delay is crucial, like online gaming or live auctions.

Security:

• HLS: Can be secured with HTTPS and DRM (Digital Rights Management) to protect your content from unauthorised access.
• RTMP: Traditionally less secure than HLS, but secure versions like RTMPS are available.

Ease of use:

• HLS: Generally easier to set up and manage, especially with readily available libraries and tools.
• RTMP: It might require more technical expertise for configuration and deployment.

Use cases:

• HLS: Perfect for on-demand video streaming, live streams with moderate latency requirements, and reaching a wide audience across various devices.
• RTMP: Ideal for low-latency live streams like online gaming, live auctions, and interactive applications where minimal delay is essential.

Remember, the best protocol depends on your specific needs. Consider factors like target audience, latency requirements, budget, and technical expertise before choosing one.

Best HLS and RTMP alternative

As you weigh the strengths and weaknesses of both HLS and RTMP, you might find yourself questioning if there's a superior option out there. Prepare to be amazed because the answer lies in WebRTC (Web Real-Time Communication), a robust alternative that adeptly tackles the limitations of its predecessors.

WebRTC is a revolutionary technology built right into modern browsers. This eliminates the need for plugins or additional software, making it incredibly accessible and user-friendly. It shines in real-time communication, offering low latency and smooth performance, similar to RTMP. Additionally, WebRTC boasts built-in security features, including encryption and authentication, for peace of mind when streaming sensitive content.

Advantages of WebRTC over HLS and RTMP

• Ultra-low latency: Perfect for two-way communication and real-time collaboration.
• Browser-native: No plugins or installations needed.
• Secure by default: Encrypted communication with support for authentication.
• Scalable: With SFUs, it supports large group calls.
• Mobile-friendly: Works across modern mobile browsers.

WebRTC is the foundation of modern video conferencing tools and is increasingly the preferred choice for developers prioritising privacy and compliance.

Disadvantages of WebRTC

Enhancing video conferencing with Digital Samba: harnessing the power of WebRTC

Digital Samba provides a privacy-first WebRTC video SDK and API that can be embedded into apps with minimal code.

• Compliant: Full GDPR adherence, with EU-only hosting.
• Easy to implement: Works out of the box with developer-friendly docs.
• Customisable: Adjust roles, permissions, UI, and feature sets.
• Private by design: No data harvesting. Ever.

Conclusion

Still stuck deciding between RTMP vs HLS or wondering about YouTube HLS vs RTMPS workflows? Here’s a recap:

• Use RTMPS to send live video securely from OBS to YouTube.
• Use HLS to deliver that video to viewers across devices.
• Use WebRTC if your use case demands instant interaction, enhanced security, and full GDPR compliance.

Want to embed real-time video into your product without worrying about infrastructure or compliance? Create a free account to get 10,000 HD-quality video call minutes and enjoy smooth video streaming.