Safeguarding personal data and privacy is a growing concern for the global digital ecosystem. To address this issue, various governments and international organisations have introduced data privacy regulations.
Table of Contents
- General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in the United States
- Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) in Canada
- PIPEDA vs. GDPR vs. HIPAA: comparative analysis
- PIPEDA vs. GDPR vs. HIPAA: overlap between regulations
- PIPEDA vs. GDPR vs. HIPAA: differences & challenges
- PIPEDA vs. GDPR vs. HIPAA: key takeaways
Three significant data privacy and security regulations are:
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union
Implemented in May 2018, GDPR protects the personal data of EU citizens. It applies to any organisation processing personal data within or outside the EU that offers goods or services to EU residents or monitors their behaviour.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in the United States
HIPAA was enacted in 1996. It primarily focuses on protecting healthcare data. It applies to healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses. HIPAA aims to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of protected healthcare information.
Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) in Canada
PIPEDA was enacted into law on April 13, 2000, to foster confidence among consumers in electronic commerce. It covers the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information by organisations during commercial activities.
Let’s explore the key aspects and the degree of overlap between PIPEDA vs. GDPR vs. HIPAA.
PIPEDA vs. GDPR vs. HIPAA: comparative analysis
The table below highlights the key factors of data privacy regulations and compares GDPR, PIPEDA, and HIPAA regulation frameworks on their similarities and differences.
|
Aspect
|
GDPR
|
HIPAA
|
PIPEDA
|
|
Jurisdiction
|
EU Member States
|
United States
|
Canada
|
|
Applicability
|
Any organisation handling EU data.
|
Healthcare providers and plans.
|
Private sector organisations.
|
|
Type of data covered
|
Personal data, such as names, addresses, contact information, financial information, etc.
|
Healthcare data, such as PHI, medical records, health insurance information, payment data, etc.
|
Personal information, such as contact information, financial data, employment information, etc.
|
|
Consent requirements
|
Explicit consent is required.
|
Patient consent is required.
|
Implied consent often suffices.
|
|
Data transfer abroad
|
Data can be transferred to countries with "adequate" data protection measures without additional safeguards. For others, Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) or Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs) are required.
|
HIPAA doesn't address international transfers directly, but organisations must ensure PHI protection when sending data abroad through Business Associate Agreements (BAAs).
|
PIPEDA requires organisations to obtain individuals' consent before transferring personal information abroad. Organisations should inform individuals about the potential risks of foreign data transfers.
|
|
Personally Identifiable Information (PII) encryption at rest & transit
|
Required
|
Requires appropriate safeguards to protect PHI.
|
Not explicitly required
|
|
Penalties
|
A fine of €20 million, or up to 4% of annual worldwide turnover.
|
Civil monetary penalties ($100-$50,000 per violation) and criminal penalties ($250,000 per violation and potential imprisonment).
|
A fine of up to 100,000 CAD per violation.
|
|
Controlled access to sensitive data
|
Mandates controlled access to personal data, especially sensitive data. Requires strict authentication, authorization, and monitoring measures.
|
Requires controlled access to protected health information (PHI). Enforces role-based access control through Business Associate Agreements (BAAs).
|
Does not specify any specific controls but mandates appropriate security safeguards. Organisations should control access to sensitive personal information and restrict it to authorised personnel.
|
|
Data breach notifications
|
72 hours.
|
Within 60 days.
|
Within a reasonable time frame.
|
|
Appointed Data Protection Officer (DPO)
|
Required
|
Required
|
Required
|
PIPEDA vs. GDPR vs. HIPAA: overlap between regulations
Let’s highlight the common ground between PIPEDA, GDPR, and HIPAA.
PIPEDA vs. GDPR vs. HIPAA: differences & challenges
Here is a list of differences between PIPEDA vs. GDPR vs. HIPAA.
- Scope: GDPR applies to a broader range of data and organisations, while HIPAA is more specific to healthcare, and PIPEDA focuses on the private sector.
- Consent requirements: GDPR requires explicit user consent, HIPAA relies on patient consent, while PIPEDA often assumes consent without explicit, formal approval.
- Penalties: GDPR can result in fines of up to 4% of a company's global revenue, while HIPAA enforces civil and criminal penalties. PIPEDA imposes fines of up to $100,000 per violation for non-compliance.
- PII encryption: GDPR requires PII encryption, while HIPAA requires PHI encryption.
On the other hand, there are no specific encryption policies for PIPEDA, but it is required as a best practice to safeguard sensitive data.
- Data transfer abroad: GDPR mandates stringent cross-border data transfer rules. From the EU to the US, cross-border data transfers can only occur under the special EU-US Data Privacy Framework. HIPAA and PIPEDA are more flexible.
PIPEDA vs. GDPR vs. HIPAA: key takeaways
While GDPR, HIPAA, and PIPEDA share some common principles, they also have distinct requirements and enforcement mechanisms. Organisations operating in multiple regions must carefully navigate the nuances of these regulations via their legal teams to ensure compliance and uphold the privacy rights of individuals.
