TCP vs UDP Protocols: Key Differences, Use Cases & Performance Guide

Imagine trying to watch a live stream or make a secure payment online. Ever noticed how some apps are lightning-fast while others take their time to load? That difference often boils down to the choice between TCP and UDP.

These two protocols are the engines that move your data across the internet. They decide how fast your messages, video calls, and files reach their destination—and how safely. Understanding how they work can help developers, IT teams, and even business leaders make smarter decisions when building digital products.

Table of Contents

1. What is the TCP protocol?
2. Use cases of the TCP protocol
3. What is the UDP protocol?
4. Use cases of the UDP protocol
5. What is TCP vs UDP: comparison between TCP and UDP protocols 
6. Performance considerations
7. Security considerations 
8. How to choose between TCP and UDP?
9. Experience secure and frictionless meetings with Digital Samba video conferencing API 

In this guide, we'll explain what TCP and UDP really do, compare them side by side, and help you pick the right one depending on your use case—whether it's online gaming, file sharing, or building a high-performance video conferencing app like Digital Samba.

What is the TCP protocol?

TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) is a connection-oriented protocol designed to deliver data reliably and in the correct order. It creates a virtual connection between the sender and receiver using a three-way handshake mechanism before any data transfer begins.

Key features of TCP:

• Connection-oriented: Requires a handshake before data transmission.

• Reliable delivery: Guarantees packet delivery through acknowledgements and retransmissions.

• Ordered data transfer: Ensures data arrives in the same sequence as sent.

• Flow & congestion control: Adjusts data flow based on network capacity.

• Error checking: Uses checksums to detect errors and request retransmission.

TCP is like booking a courier service with delivery confirmation. The sender and receiver both know when the parcel left, where it is en route, and whether it arrived, complete with a signature.

Common applications of TCP

TCP is widely used in scenarios where reliable delivery and data integrity are critical. Its connection-oriented design ensures that each bit of data reaches the destination in the correct order, making it a go-to choice for tasks that cannot afford errors or missing information.

• Web browsing (HTTP/HTTPS): When you visit a website, every element—images, text, scripts—needs to load correctly. TCP ensures that your browser receives all pieces of the page in the right order, even if they’re delivered across multiple packets.

• Email (SMTP/IMAP): Email systems rely on TCP to make sure your messages are fully transmitted, attachments included. Without it, parts of a message could go missing or arrive out of order.

• File transfers (FTP): Whether uploading a large document or downloading software, TCP guarantees that the entire file arrives intact, without corruption or missing segments.

• Online banking: Accuracy and security are non-negotiable in financial transactions. TCP supports encryption protocols and ensures data integrity to keep your financial information safe.

• Remote access (SSH/Telnet): Securely logging into another machine remotely demands both consistency and security, both strengths of TCP, which maintains an active connection throughout your session.

Understanding RTMP Protocol: A Comprehensive Guide

Read the blog

Understanding RTMP Protocol: A Comprehensive Guide

What is the UDP?

UDP (User Datagram Protocol) is a connectionless protocol that sends data without establishing a prior connection. It sacrifices reliability for speed and is perfect for real-time applications where every millisecond counts.

Key features of UDP:

• Connectionless: No handshake; sends data immediately.

• Faster transmission: Less overhead than TCP.

• No delivery guarantee: Doesn’t retransmit lost packets.

• Supports broadcasting & multicasting

• Low latency: Ideal for time-sensitive data.

UDP is like shouting across a room—you send your message quickly and directly, but you can't be sure the other person heard it exactly as intended.

Common applications of UDP

UDP shines in scenarios where speed and responsiveness outweigh the need for perfect reliability. Because it doesn't wait for acknowledgements or retransmit lost data, it’s the preferred choice for real-time applications where slight data loss is acceptable and low latency is critical.

• Voice over IP (VoIP): Voice calls over the internet require near-instant transmission. A dropped syllable is less disruptive than delayed speech, so UDP’s speed makes it the best fit.

• Online gaming: In competitive or fast-paced games, quick reaction times matter. UDP allows the game to run smoothly by prioritising real-time responsiveness over guaranteed delivery.

• Live video streaming: When broadcasting live events, any delay disrupts the viewing experience. UDP helps reduce buffering and latency to deliver a more seamless stream.

• DNS queries: The Domain Name System relies on brief, transactional exchanges. Using UDP speeds up these queries significantly, allowing users to reach websites faster.

• Broadcasting updates: UDP’s support for one-to-many communication makes it ideal for pushing updates to multiple users or devices at once, such as in software updates or real-time alerts.

Understanding Latency and Bandwidth: Unveiling the Key Differences

Read the blog

Understanding Latency and Bandwidth: Unveiling the Key Differences

TCP vs UDP: A side-by-side comparison

Understanding the practical differences between TCP and UDP is essential when choosing the right protocol for your application. This side-by-side comparison highlights how each protocol behaves under different conditions, their strengths and trade-offs, and which types of tasks they are best suited for.

Performance considerations

Choosing between TCP and UDP often comes down to specific performance demands. Do you need speed or reliability? Are you optimising for scalability or bandwidth efficiency? Below, we dive deeper into the technical trade-offs that can help guide your decision.

1. Speed and latency

Speed is one of UDP’s strongest assets. Because it doesn’t require a connection handshake or acknowledgements, it transmits data almost instantly. This makes it a natural fit for real-time applications like video chats, live streams, and online games. TCP, on the other hand, ensures delivery through multiple checks, which adds latency, similar to going through customs every time you cross a border.

2. Bandwidth usage

TCP consumes more bandwidth due to its built-in error correction and congestion control. It sends extra metadata like acknowledgements and sequence numbers, which help with reliability but add to the load. UDP, by skipping these steps, uses less bandwidth per packet. This can be a game-changer in bandwidth-constrained environments like mobile networks or crowded Wi-Fi zones.

Bandwidth: the meaning and how to measure it

Read the blog

Bandwidth: the meaning and how to measure it

3. Scalability

If you’re building a system that needs to handle thousands (or millions) of concurrent connections, such as a multiplayer game server or a real-time dashboard, UDP’s low overhead allows it to scale efficiently. TCP’s stateful nature means the server must track each connection individually, which consumes more memory and CPU.

4. Reliability vs real-time

TCP is designed to ensure every piece of data arrives exactly as it was sent, making it ideal for use cases like software downloads, banking transactions, or sending emails. However, this comes at the cost of speed. UDP takes the opposite approach: it’s okay with occasionally dropping a packet if it means keeping the stream flowing. This is why it’s used in voice and video applications, where a missing frame is better than a lag spike. TCP shines in reliability; UDP wins in speed. Your use case dictates the priority.

Security considerations 

Security is a vital factor when choosing between TCP and UDP, especially for applications that handle sensitive or mission-critical data. While both protocols can be secured, they approach security in fundamentally different ways.

TCP:

TCP offers several built-in advantages when it comes to maintaining data integrity and protecting against malicious interference. Its connection-oriented model, which involves a three-way handshake, makes it significantly more difficult for attackers to spoof connections. This handshake ensures that each side is a trusted party before any data is exchanged. TCP is also commonly paired with encryption protocols such as SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) or TLS (Transport Layer Security), which encrypt the data stream and prevent eavesdropping or tampering.

Additionally, because TCP maintains session state and performs integrity checks, it can detect and correct corrupted data. These features make it the preferred choice for financial transactions, online banking, email, and any application where data accuracy and confidentiality are paramount.

UDP:

UDP, by contrast, is inherently more vulnerable. It lacks the built-in mechanisms for verifying senders or ensuring data integrity. This makes it susceptible to various types of attacks, such as spoofing and Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, where massive amounts of data are sent to overwhelm the system.

That said, UDP can be secured with additional protocols like DTLS (Datagram Transport Layer Security), which bring some of the benefits of TLS to a connectionless environment. However, these protections are not native to UDP and must be explicitly implemented. Developers using UDP must be cautious and proactive in incorporating these extra security layers, especially in applications where privacy and authenticity matter.

How to choose between TCP and UDP?

Selecting between TCP or UDP is a critical decision influenced by various factors, including application requirements and network conditions. When to use UDP vs TCP depends on specific considerations to ensure optimal performance and functionality. 

Let's explore the factors influencing the choice of TCP vs UDP.

Application requirements

• Reliability: TCP is connection-oriented and guarantees reliable data delivery. Therefore, TCP is preferred if your application demands error-free and ordered data transmission.
• Real-time communication: UDP is often favoured for real-time communication due to its low latency. Applications like online gaming or voice-over-IP (VoIP) benefit from UDP's speed, even though it sacrifices some reliability. 
• TCP vs UDP speed: UDP is faster than TCP, but does not perform error checking.

Network conditions

• Packet loss tolerance: UDP is more tolerant of packet loss as it does not retransmit lost packets. In situations where occasional data loss is tolerable, UDP may be suitable.
• Congestion: TCP adjusts its transmission rate based on network congestion, which can lead to delays. UDP, being connectionless, can perform better in situations with high network congestion.

Understanding and Preventing Packet Loss in WebRTC

Read the blog

Understanding and Preventing Packet Loss in WebRTC

Security

TCP provides a more secure communication channel with reliable and ordered delivery, making it preferable for secure data transfer.

Latency

UDP's lower overhead contributes to reduced latency, making it preferable for applications requiring real-time responsiveness, such as live broadcasting, video streaming, etc.

Choosing the right protocol for video conferencing

Now that we have discussed the factors influencing the choice between UDP and TCP, let’s discuss how to choose the right protocol.

Below are evaluation criteria to help you choose the right protocol for video conferencing. 

• Evaluate application characteristics: Consider the sensitivity of the transmitted data. If maintaining the order and completeness of data is crucial, TCP is a suitable choice.
• Assess network conditions: Evaluate the network’s stability and the bandwidth’s availability. TCP is more adaptive to varying network conditions, making it safer in less stable environments.
• Consider communication patterns: Assess how the application communicates. If it involves constant data updates and real-time interaction, UDP may enhance the user experience.

Understanding Network Speed, Bandwidth, and Throughput

Read the blog

Understanding Network Speed, Bandwidth, and Throughput

A hybrid approach

Sometimes, a hybrid approach combining TCP and UDP is beneficial. This allows leveraging TCP’s reliability for critical data exchange and UDP’s speed for fast transfer to enhance the efficiency based on specific requirements within the application.

For instance, most web traffic relies on the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) with TCP as its transport protocol. However, TCP proves inefficient for brief web conversations, which constitute a significant portion of web traffic. The setup and teardown overhead of the TCP state is less than ideal for these short connections.

A hybrid approach, which employs TCP or UDP as the underlying transport protocol for web traffic, can address this challenge. UDP is used for short transfers like HTTP redirection to minimise TCP overhead while retaining TCP for reliable delivery and congestion control benefits.

When to use TCP vs UDP

Choosing the right protocol often depends on the nature of the task. This table includes common real-world scenarios and recommends whether TCP or UDP is better suited to each use case based on reliability, speed, and efficiency needs.

Optimising Real-Time Communications with Jitter Buffers

Read the blog

Optimising Real-Time Communications with Jitter Buffers

Experience secure and frictionless meetings with Digital Samba video conferencing API 

Both TCP and UDP serve essential roles.

• Choose TCP when data integrity and order are paramount.
• Choose UDP when speed and responsiveness are more important than perfection.

Understanding the trade-offs allows developers and decision-makers to architect better systems.

For a comprehensive video conferencing solution that optimally handles diverse network conditions, consider embedding video room API. Our API employs TCP and UDP protocols, ensuring a seamless and reliable communication experience. 

Whether you prioritise reliability or real-time responsiveness, Digital Samba's hybrid approach caters to varied application needs.

For a video conferencing solution that leverages the strengths of both TCP and UDP, request a demo today to explore Digital Samba's video conferencing API!

FAQs

What is the main difference between TCP and UDP?

TCP is reliable but slower. UDP is fast but may lose data.

Is UDP more secure than TCP?

No. UDP is generally less secure unless additional encryption, like DTLS, is used.

Can I use both TCP and UDP in one application?

Yes, many apps use TCP for setup and UDP for real-time media.

Why does gaming use UDP instead of TCP?

Speed is more critical in games. A dropped packet is better than a delay.

Which protocol does Digital Samba use?

Digital Samba uses both TCP for control signalling and UDP for fast, real-time media streaming.